Dear friends, we need to talk about something that is very close to my heart. I've been thinking about this subject for several months, since a dear friend & I talked about the opposition we feel from our various Christian communities (colleges, churches, friends, etc.) for the work that we are pursuing out of college. I think we're perceived as "socially scandalous." Christianity Today (CT) writer Mark Galli first introduced me to the term
socially scandalous in his recent
article about righteousness, language, and priorities. And I think it's fitting for the way we're treated: as if it's an impossibility to be a Christian and work in our respective fields.
I will introduce the situation by using three case studies. Two from real life, one from another CT article. Then I will summarize how each case contributes to the Evangelical community's perception of scandalous behavior. In Part II of this article, which you can expect to see posted near the end of next, I'll deal with this scandalousness from a Biblical perspective with the help of Martin Luther.
Case Study #1: majoring in biologyWhen Jane switched her major at the small christian college she was attending from graphic design to biology, she raised a few eyebrows from folks at home. When she moved out west after college to take care of animals in a research facility, she raised more than a few eyebrows. In fact, her job choice was down right scandalous.
Case Study #2: working at a human rights NGOWhen Jack took a position in a hippie state working for little pay at an organization that focused on a group of oppressed people on the other side of the globe, many Christians at home wondered why the NGO wasn't more like a mission agency. How scandalous to take up the human rights cause and not the cry for conversion. Many wondered why wasn't there a mention of evangelism in the organization's mission statement.
Case Study #3: a journalism class Source.When teaching journalism classes, CT writer Uwe Siemon-Netto, often inaugurates a new class by asking "What do you think is the calling of a Christian in secular media?" The most common response: "To report the news from God's perspective."
Siemon-Netto's response: WRONG. Why is this a scandalous response?
SummaryI'm afraid that the Evangelicals in Case Study #1 think the only ligitimate Christian working in the sciences
Ken Ham. And that a writer for Christianity Today is the archetype Christian journalist. The response of the Christian community in Cast Study #2 suggests that a Christian who wishes to serve the poor of the world is expected to go through a missions agency that prioritizes the spiritual condition over the physical condition.
With the help of Siemon-Netto, let'w begin to explore why what appears to be the correct Evangelical answer (the answer the students gave in case #3) is really proposterous: "It would be great if we knew God's cell number to ask him, 'Lord, what are your views on immigration and social security?' Alas, we don't have this option... Thus the proper response about a Christiam Journalist's vocation must be: 'I am called to report as fairly and as accurately as humanly possible. If I do this as a service of love to my readers and viewers, rather than with selfish interests in mind, I will render the highest possible service to God.'"
I think we're dealing with several issues here: The first is a lingering effect from change within the church in the mid-to-late twentieth century. That is, the division of the sacred & the secular. I also notice expression of fear of the unknown (read: secularism) in the voice of the Evangelical community. Finally, the pointing of fingers at scandelous behavior is, I think, I result of unpracticalized theology. In other words, the very Evangelicals pointing fingers have solid theology in their minds, but it hasn't been worked out into life yet. In part II of this post, I'll call for reconciliation in the break-up of the secular and the sacred, encourage my fellow Christians to take secularism by the horns and show it who is boss, and challenge you to consider making your own scandalous choices because they are the natural result of practical theology (the only kind worth hanging on to, really)...